Author Archives: Rich

Accessible Shopping Cart

Posted on 16/8/2005 by Rich

Up to now the number of shopping cart systems that are accessible i.e. valid xhtml and WAI AA has been low. I only know of 2 Karova and Trading Eye. However the downside is that they are not cheap. During … Continue reading →

Posted in Accessibility, News | 4 Comments

Thunderbird and moving emails

Posted on 3/8/2005 by Rich

I get a fair bit of email, all of which I leave in my main inbox until it is dealt with. After which I then move that email to the relevant place. Problem is Thunderbird doesn’t like quick mouse movements … Continue reading →

Posted in Rants | 2 Comments

Accesskeys: useful or not?

Posted on 22/7/2005 by Rich

John Foliot and Derek featherstone over at Wats.ca have long queried the usefullness of accesskeys, and have some very nice articles surporting their claims. More reasons why we don’t use accesskeys from December 2003 is just one of these.

Posted in Accessibility | Comments Off on Accesskeys: useful or not?

Tidybot

Posted on 11/7/2005 by Rich

W3C and WDG both offer validators for download. Every now and then I go and look at the instructions, and shudder with horror. Installation of these things is not easy, and I still don’t think I have the necessary knowledge … Continue reading →

Posted in Accessibility, News | Comments Off on Tidybot

Automated accessibility checkers

Posted on 8/7/2005 by Rich

There are an increasing number of tools that can carry out automated accessibility checks. But are they any good? For quick checks, I have long used Cynthia Says as I find the resulting report informative and easy to understand. Having … Continue reading →

Posted in Accessibility | 1 Comment

How accessible are embedded movies?

Posted on 1/7/2005 by Rich

Today I have been wrestling with embedding a movie into a web page. To try and ensure cross browser, and cross platform, usability I have had to use the <embed> inside an <object> On an XHTML 1.0 Strict page, this … Continue reading →

Posted in Accessibility | 5 Comments